TWO CLANCY BOMBSHELLS IN ONE DAY — AND ONE OF THEM JUST CHANGED THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE

TWO CLANCY BOMBSHELLS IN ONE DAY — AND ONE OF THEM JUST CHANGED THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE.

The Lindsay Clancy case just got VERY interesting heading into September 29.

BOMBSHELL #1: THE HOLDOUT JUROR’S BROTHER IS SPEAKING.

The brother of the lone holdout juror says he does not believe religion influenced his brother’s decision. His explanation? His brother “looked at the case, and he made the call.” He also says the family had NO IDEA his brother was even sitting on the Clancy jury until after the mistrial.

That comes after other jurors publicly described a very different picture of deliberations — including allegations that the holdout acknowledged reasonable doubt but still would not join the other 11 jurors. The juror himself still has not publicly explained his reasoning.

BOMBSHELL #2: LOOK WHO JUST ENTERED THE CASE. 👀

Attorney Martin Weinberg has now joined Lindsay Clancy’s defense team for the fight over whether she can constitutionally be tried again.

Yes. THAT Martin Weinberg.

Weinberg represented Karen Read in the double-jeopardy litigation following her first mistrial — the fight over whether the jury had actually reached final decisions on certain charges before the mistrial was declared.

Now he is entering Clancy.

That is not a random addition to the defense table.

Clancy’s defense is preparing to argue that double-jeopardy principles should prevent another prosecution after what happened inside that jury room and before Judge Sullivan declared the mistrial. The reported 11-1 division, the jury notes, the statements from jurors after the mistrial, what the court knew before discharging the jury, and whether any verdict had effectively been reached are now potentially ᑕriᩚtiᩚcal pieces of that fight.

A hung jury ordinarily permits the Commonwealth to retry a defendant. But that is the beginning of the double-jeopardy analysis here — not necessarily the end of it. The defense isn’t treating September 29 like another motion hearing. They are building a constitutional fight over whether there should ever be a second trial at all.

Reddington preserved the record. Now Weinberg is walking into it.

Related Posts

Disturbing family details emerge about mom arrested for leaving 4 kids home alone during Vegas jaunt

The Florida mom accused of leaving her four kids home alone while traveling to Las Vegas for nearly a week filed for divorce against her allegedly abusive…

exє𝔠uti☉n Team Allegedly Used 10 Needles and Feared Christa Pike’s Veins Had ‘Blown’

Pike, 50, was hospitalized and placed on a ventilator after Tennessee failed to execute her on Sept. 30 The team responsible for executing convicted 𝘬iᩚller Christa Pike…

Feds raid billionaire’s Beverly Hills mansion in dramatic Eric Swalwell probe — as source reveals 𝘴єx worker link

The FBI a Beverly Hills mansion in connection with the investigation into disgraced California politician Eric Swalwell — and the raid is linked to a 𝘴єx worker,…

Lindsay Clancy-obsessed mom Corie Walsh ‘fully’ supported by family who know ‘psychosis’ also to blame for her 𝘬iᩚlling son: lawyer

Corie Walsh, the Lindsay Clancy-obsessed mom accused of hanging her 2-year-old son, has the full support of her family, according to her attorney, who pinned the “unimaginable…

Clancy juror claims holdout didn’t show ‘single piece of evidence’ explaining vote

A juror in the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new details about what he said happened inside the jury room that led to a mistrial in…

US Army soldier Zarrius Hildabrand sentenced to 59 years in prison for murdering wife, dumping her in storm drain

A heinous US Army soldier who fatally shot his 21-year-old wife before joining her anguished family in search efforts despite knowing she was dead has been sentenced…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *